Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Social Media is Killing the Social Critic
This is going to be quick. I hope I someday come back to
this as I have a LOT of thoughts about it.
My friend Pam told me today she’s annoyed with Facebook. “Nobody
talks on Facebook anymore,” she said. “They just post pictures and share
videos.”
As it happens this coincides with a good example of why
abstaining from social media has been weird these last 40-some days.
Like I said before, Nikki is on social media diet but
Bariatric Foodie is not. But when I use Facebook as Bariatric Foodie I cannot
see what’s going on in the general populace of Facebook, only what relates to
my page (which is mostly connected to other health and nutrition outlets).
Well today I notice everyone’s profile picture seems to be
an equal sign. I’m assuming this is in reaction to the Supreme Court hearings
on the constitutionality of banning same-sex marriage. I also assume those who
changed their profile picture to an equal sign are supportive of same-sex
marriage.
I think this is the power and the curse of social media,
frankly. The power is that people can communicate, affirm, deny and rebuke
things en masse very quickly. And with social influence, those decisions can
easily become movements that affect social change.
The curse is that all this is being done without a lot of
discourse.
Discourse? Yes, discourse.
Back inna day people used to talk about these things and
debate them. Those who relished a good debate (present company included) would
go point for point against people with opposing thoughts. We’d examine and
cross-examine each other’s arguments, looking for fallacious thinking, biases
or bigotries — and we’d expose them!
Now there is an equal sign as your profile picture. And that’s
all you need to say about it.
But when I see that icon, I wonder, “why?” Why do you
support gay marriage? (Not that I don’t support it but still) Do you know why?
Or is it because everyone else does? Does this issue affect your moral
platform? Does it partially define who you are as a person? It probably does
because if you support same sex marriage one could easily assume you are at
least a little bit egalitarian, open to change, maybe you’re compassionate or
maybe you’re just practical (denying gays marriage is a messy business since
they have forged forward with creating families and shared property and
whatnot).
So why? I’d like to know. And why not (if not)? No matter
where I sit on this or ANY issue, I can stand to learn something new. And your
perspective might be something new I need to learn. But I’ll never know that if
we don’t talk about it, if we don’t engage in discourse.
To me, the whole thing is a sad testament to our society.
Political correctness has become this religion to which we have prescribed. The
religion of “being a good person.” In this religion (which I believe to be an
attempt to take God out of the equation but that’s a whole other blog post) the
supreme value is political correctness. And the etiquette is to make a stand
without offending anyone, which is a most obvious oxymoron in my opinion.
Social media, being what it is and evolving the way it is
evolving, serves as a perfect platform for this religion. It is a space where
you don’t HAVE to state your beliefs or engage in discourse if you don’t want
to. In fact, with sites like Twitter, you are actually encouraged NOT to.
Instead you have icons. Equal signs that you make into your profile pictures en
masse. Those are your proxy votes. They speak for you because you choose, for
whatever reason, not to speak for yourself.
I’m not quite sure how to feel about that. On the one hand
it has the power to undermine unjust systems (a digital “Underground Railroad”
if you will). But on the other hand it drives our society, culturally, toward a
view of the world that discourages friendly debate impassioned discourse,
agreeing and disagreeing in “gentlemanly” ways. I kind of miss that about the
world. And I for one can begin to see the lack of critical thinking skills this
new way of communicating is promoting. Frankly, I’m not sure most people know
HOW to put together a good argument or defend it. And do people even know
fallacious arguments when they see them? Or is everything a function of
marketing, and by virtue of marketing, anything can be right and logical?
I dunno. More questions than answers on this one.
Comments:
<< Home
I think part of it is the Twitter generation. If we can't say what we want to say in 140 characters, we don't want to read/see it. I'm guilty of doing this myself sometimes - however, I also start and encourage conversations between people on topics that I think are important. (It's just unusual that they go on very long).
Post a Comment
<< Home